The Vanishing Veep: Jagdeep Dhankhar Resigned Like a Whisper in a Thunderstorm

 
From House Humour to Presidential Haze in Five Hours Flat—How Jagdeep Dhankhar’s Silent Exit Turned Raisina Hill into a Theatre of Whispers and Shadows.

At 4:30 PM, Jagdeep Dhankhar was the very picture of constitutional confidence—smiling, sharp, and at ease in the Vice President’s chair in Rajya Sabha. By 9:30 PM, he was at Rashtrapati Bhavan, resignation in hand, delivering the political equivalent of a ghost exit. No prior appointment. No televised emotion. Just five hours of invisible turbulence, and India’s Vice President was gone, like a magician’s final act—no smoke, no mirrors, just silence. Delhi hasn’t stopped whispering since.

It wasn’t just a resignation. It was a political vanishing act worthy of Houdini. The man who just hours before had chaired the House with a blend of wit, wisdom, and a constitutional command that few could rival, simply walked off the stage without a curtain call. There was no illness in sight. No weariness. He had even extended a lunch invitation to MPs for the next day. The script was still mid-scene. And yet, someone—something—called cut.

The official reason? Health. The visual evidence? Contradictory. Dhankhar looked and sounded healthier than most in the chamber. Not an ounce of fatigue betrayed him. He quoted constitutional clauses with ease, punctuated debate with humour, and moved through his schedule with the calm of a man in full control. If this was illness, it was one without symptoms—more spiritual than physical, more political than biological.

And if his exit felt surreal, the Prime Minister’s reaction turned the dial up to uncanny. Modi’s farewell tweet was cold steel wrapped in protocol: “Jagdeep Dhankhar has served the nation. Wishing him good health.” Period. No nostalgia. No “friend and colleague.” The Hindi version? Even colder—“Desh ki seva ka avsar mila”—a line usually reserved for civil servants taking VRS, not the country’s second-highest constitutional authority bowing out. For a leader who routinely offers emotional tributes and poetic farewells, this one felt more like a door being shut with minimal noise.

Was Dhankhar pushed for daring to walk a line too fine? Earlier that day, Rajya Sabha had taken up an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma, backed by 63 MPs. Dhankhar, ever the constitutionalist, didn’t dodge. He examined its merits under Articles 124 and 217, setting a tone that was clinical, lawful, and devoid of political bias. Meanwhile, Union Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal disclosed a similar motion in the Lok Sabha—this one backed by 152 MPs. There was no grandstanding, just due process. But that’s exactly where things may have gone wrong.

Sources say the ruling party expected a pause, a delay, or better yet, a quiet burial of the motion. Instead, Dhankhar did what he was supposed to do—he followed the book, not the whispers in the hallway. That alone, in today’s hyper-aligned political ecosystem, might have been enough to write his exit note for him.

The Business Advisory Committee meeting held later added to the intrigue. BJP heavyweights like JP Nadda and Kiran Rijiju were conspicuously absent, replaced by second-string attendees. It was as if the script had flipped, and Dhankhar was suddenly acting in a scene without a co-star. Within hours, the meeting he planned to host the next day was irrelevant. His resignation, quietly submitted that very night, was not just an act of departure—it was a declaration of detachment from a power play he didn’t script.

What makes it darker is the unrelenting silence that followed. The President accepted the resignation like one clears a file—no public message, no appreciation. The BJP, usually adept at narrative-building and spin control, has left a conspicuous vacuum. There was no party posturing, no television face defending or explaining the resignation. The silence is not just suspicious—it’s symphonic.

Was it Dhankhar’s past that finally caught up with him? His Congress origins, his lawyerly fidelity to the Constitution, his cautious distance from performative nationalism—all these elements once made him a balanced choice. But perhaps balance is no longer the virtue it once was. Perhaps his subtle resistance to toeing the line was noted, marked, and filed under “non-compliant.”

In the political grapevine, the theories range from the rational to the chilling. Some say he received an ultimatum. Others whisper of pressure too intense to name publicly. A few believe the impeachment motion was the final straw in a string of silent disagreements. The wildest version? That Dhankhar chose to walk before he was pushed, holding onto his dignity while letting the ambiguity speak louder than any press conference could.

But in all the noise—or lack thereof—one thing remains certain: the Vice President who presided over proceedings at 4:30 PM was not the man who resigned at 9:30 PM. The transformation was invisible but irreversible. The questions outnumber the answers. And yet, everyone knows something snapped, shifted, or soured in those cryptic five hours.

As the echo of his resignation fades into Delhi’s thick monsoon air, one line from Dev Anand’s 1978 film refuses to leave the mind: “Mere dil se baithe mehfil mein hota hai koi kaise?” How does someone disappear from a gathering so completely, so wordlessly?

In most democracies, exits are loud. In this one, Dhankhar’s was a whisper that cracked the walls. Not with volume—but with the weight of what it didn’t say.

Visit arjasrikanth.in for more insights


Leave a comment