The Great Indian Accreditation Bazaar: NAAC Turned College Ratings into a Corrupt Marketplace!!

Education is often touted as the great equalizer, a powerful tool capable of lifting communities and propelling nations toward progress. In India, the extraordinary competition among higher education institutions has turned accreditation into a highly sought-after validation. Enter the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC), an autonomous body that promises to uphold educational quality and integrity through a structured grading system. However, recent events have revealed a disquieting reality: the very mechanisms designed to maintain educational standards have been infested by corruption, transforming prestige into a marketplace where grades can be bought.

The National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) is responsible for evaluating colleges based on curriculum, education quality, infrastructure, research, governance, and student support. However, concerns have been raised about its credibility, with allegations of corruption and manipulation of accreditation ranks. Reports suggest that institutions with outdated curricula and poor research output have received high grades, while reputed colleges have been unfairly rated lower. In some cases, NAAC’s evaluation appears superficial, focusing on hospitality over academic excellence. Such inconsistencies question the integrity of the accreditation process, highlighting the need for transparency and genuine efforts to uphold educational standards.

NAAC was established in 1994, with the noble aim of evaluating and accrediting institutions for their adherence to predefined quality parameters across various educational dimensions, including infrastructure, faculty, curriculum, and governance. This grading system is crucial; an A+ or A++ conferred by NAAC is not merely an accolade but a gateway to additional funding, enhanced reputation, and bolstered enrolment opportunities for institutions. In a highly stratified academic landscape, these grades wield enormous power and influence.

Yet, investigations have unmasked a startling degree of illicit practices within the NAAC assessment framework. Recent allegations expose a disturbing intertwining of academia and corruption that harks back to precedents set by scandals in other regulatory bodies. The Medical Council of India, for instance, has faced similar corruption crises, demonstrating that the root problems persist across sectors.

At the centre of the current scandal are individuals tasked with evaluating institutions for accreditation. Instead of championing academic integrity, some members of the NAAC inspection committees have reportedly traded favourable evaluations for bribes, revealing a systemic rot. This isn’t just an abstraction; specific cases involve negotiations where institutions desperate for top-tier ratings are effectively compelled to pay significant sums, confirming the damaging reality: money speaks louder than merit.

The ramifications of this transactional approach to accreditation are profound and pervasive. For one, students are caught in an elaborate web of deceit. Attending an A+ rated institution, they believe they are receiving a quality education, only to find themselves in environments that fail to deliver the promised academic rigor. When these individuals graduate, they do so with degrees devoid of the competencies their institutions claimed to impart, leading to a workforce saturated with inadequately prepared graduates.

Furthermore, the impact ripples outwards, diluting professional standards across industries. Employers rely on accredited education as a marker of quality, yet they are often oblivious to the fact that these metrics are skewed by bribery and deceit. Real talent becomes obscured by the façade of inflated institutional reputations, potentially resulting in concerning misalignments between job requirements and applicant qualifications.

As investigations into the corruption surrounding NAAC unfold, questions regarding the integrity of the accreditation process loom large. With high-profile figures and institutions implicated, the credibility of university grades comes into profound question. If grades can be purchased, then what does it say about the legitimacy of academic credentials? This crisis risks overshadowing genuine academic efforts and undermines the educational system as a whole.

Moreover, the organizational structure of NAAC, comprising academics, educational administrators, and representatives from governmental bodies, ideally promotes balanced oversight. However, it can also inadvertently create fertile ground for favouritism and corrupt practices. When those entrusted to monitor and uphold educational integrity become complicit in its degradation, the system collapses under the weight of its own contradictions.

Some leaders within education and accreditation circles have publicly vowed to address these issues, pledging reforms aimed at enhancing oversight, transparency, and accountability. However, history suggests that mere promises often fall short of producing real change. If advancements are to materialize, a fundamental overhaul of the system is essential.

The path forward mandates an independent inspection process, where evaluators are chosen through transparent criteria that uphold their integrity above reproach. Additionally, incorporating technology in the form of AI for accreditation assessments could help mitigate the risks associated with human bias and corruption. Institutions that fail to comply with ethical standards should face severe consequences, including loss of accreditation and potential legal repercussions.

Finally, there needs to be a cultural shift within educational institutions, fostering a reverence for authentic excellence over mere appearances. Until grading becomes a symbol of genuine achievement rather than a commodity to be traded, the pernicious cycle of corruption will undoubtedly persist.

The unsettling events surrounding NAAC should serve as an urgent wake-up call, prompting all stakeholders in education to confront these uncomfortable truths. The integrity of the educational landscape hinges on genuine assessments, and the future of countless aspiring students rests in the balance. We must reclaim education from the clutches of corruption, ensuring that it remains the great equalizer as it was always meant to be. Glaring contradictions—between purpose and practice, quality and façade—must be resolved if we are to restore credibility and faith in the very institutions that are tasked with shaping our future. The moment for introspection and reform is now, if we are to avert a grim trajectory that tarnishes the transformative potential of education.

Visit arjasrikanth.in /@DrArjasreekanth for more insights