The Double Whammy of Indirect Taxes and the Removal of Indexation Benefits

In India, a significant portion of an individual’s earnings is allocated to taxes, both direct and indirect. On average, nearly 40% of a person’s income is directed towards government taxes, which underscores a substantial financial burden. This taxation system implies that a considerable part of the income earned by individuals goes to paying taxes, which are then used by the government to fund various programs, including subsidies and welfare schemes. This allocation often shifts the focus away from wealth creation and economic growth.

The tax burden for an average salaried individual is notably high, with everyday activities and purchases subject to indirect taxes in the form of Goods and Services Tax (GST). This includes a range of routine expenses such as dining out, refuelling vehicles, purchasing grooming products, and watching movies. These activities are all subject to GST, adding to the overall expenditure. When combined with direct taxes, such as income tax, the total tax liability can consume almost 43% of a person’s income.

India’s direct tax system is primarily composed of income tax, which, as of September 2021, includes different tax slabs: up to ₹2.5 lakh is tax-free; income between ₹2.5 lakh and ₹5 lakh is taxed at 5%; income between ₹5 lakh and ₹10 lakh is taxed at 20%; and income above ₹10 lakh is taxed at 30%. Indirect taxes, on the other hand, include GST, customs duties, excise duties, and service tax. GST rates vary by item, with essentials being taxed at a lower rate and luxury goods at a higher rate. While income tax affects a relatively small segment of the population—approximately 1% of Indians—GST impacts almost everyone, with its effects varying based on individual consumption patterns.

The substantial tax burden on the average Indian highlights the necessity for effective tax planning and a comprehensive understanding of how taxes affect daily life. This complexity becomes even more pronounced with recent changes introduced in the Union Budget concerning the taxation of real estate sales. Specifically, the government has decided to withdraw indexation benefits for long-term capital gains, a move that has stirred significant discussion among property owners, investors, and the real estate sector as a whole.

To grasp the full implications of these changes, it is important to understand the concept of indexation and its benefits. Indexation involves adjusting the value of an asset to account for inflation, ensuring that capital gains tax reflects real gains rather than nominal ones. For instance, if an individual purchased a flat for ₹1,00,000 two decades ago and its market value has since appreciated to ₹2,00,000, the apparent capital gain would be ₹1,00,000, suggesting a 100% profit. However, inflation plays a critical role in determining the actual value of money over time. Assuming an annual inflation rate of 4%, the original ₹1,00,000 would need to be adjusted for inflation over twenty years, resulting in an inflation-adjusted value of approximately ₹1,65,000. Therefore, the real capital gain, when accounting for inflation, is only ₹35,000, not ₹1,00,000. Indexation benefits allow taxpayers to exclude the effects of inflation from their taxable gains, ensuring they are taxed only on the real profit.

Previously, indexation benefits were provided on long-term capital gains from the sale of assets such as properties, gold, and other investments. This benefit allowed individuals to calculate their capital gains more accurately by reflecting their true financial position. The tax on capital gains was computed based on the adjusted figure, which significantly reduced the tax burden. However, the recent budget announcement has introduced two significant changes: the removal of indexation benefits and a reduction in the tax rate on long-term capital gains from 20% to 12.5%. These changes have generated considerable debate among economists, property owners, and potential buyers, prompting a re-evaluation of real estate investment strategies.

With the withdrawal of indexation benefits, individuals selling properties will face a higher taxable amount. For instance, without indexation, the capital gains would be calculated as ₹1,00,000, leading to a tax of ₹10,000. With indexation, the real gain was reduced to ₹35,000, resulting in a tax of only ₹3,500. This change could significantly increase tax liabilities for property owners, particularly those who acquired their properties many years ago when prices were lower. Although the reduction in tax rates may provide some relief, the net effect will depend on individual circumstances.

The effectiveness of the new tax structure depends on two critical factors: the inflation rate and the rate at which property prices appreciate. If inflation rates remain high and property prices do not keep pace, the absence of indexation benefits could impose severe tax liabilities on sellers. Conversely, if property values rise significantly relative to inflation, the reduced tax rate might offset the loss of indexation benefits. The impact of these changes will differ across various regions in India. For instance, property prices in major urban centres like Mumbai and Delhi have historically increased at a faster rate compared to smaller towns. Consequently, property owners in high-growth areas may experience less benefit from the removal of indexation than those in areas with stagnant property values.

A significant concern arising from the withdrawal of indexation benefits is the potential increase in black money within real estate transactions. Higher tax liabilities could prompt some property owners to underreport property values to evade taxes, exacerbating issues related to unaccounted cash in the sector and challenging efforts to promote transparency in real estate dealings.

The withdrawal of indexation benefits represents a transformative shift in the taxation landscape for real estate transactions in India. While the reduction in tax rates may offer some relief, the removal of indexation benefits raises considerable concerns for property sellers. This change is likely to increase tax liabilities, especially for those who have held properties for long periods, as they will now face higher taxable gains without the ability to adjust for inflation. The varying impacts across regional property markets will further complicate the situation, with sellers in high-growth areas potentially faring better than those in stagnant markets. Additionally, the risk of increased black money circulation poses a challenge to the government’s efforts to enhance transparency and accountability in the real estate sector.

As the Indian economy continues to evolve, these tax reforms will shape the future of real estate transactions, influencing market dynamics and investment behavior. The withdrawal of indexation benefits is part of a broader strategy to streamline the tax system and boost revenue generation. However, it also highlights the delicate balance policymakers must strike between fiscal objectives and economic growth. Real estate is a crucial component of the Indian economy, contributing significantly to GDP and employment. Policy changes affecting this sector have far-reaching consequences for economic stability and growth.

One immediate concern is the potential slowdown in the real estate market. Higher tax liabilities could deter potential sellers, leading to reduced market supply, which could, in turn, drive up property prices and make real estate less affordable for buyers. The overall market impact will depend on how these changes are perceived and managed by stakeholders. Investors, traditionally viewing real estate as a safe and profitable investment, may need to reassess their strategies due to the withdrawal of indexation benefits. This shift might lead them to seek alternative investment avenues that offer better tax efficiency, affecting the flow of capital into the real estate sector and its subsequent growth.

For property developers, the new tax regime presents both challenges and opportunities. Higher tax liabilities for sellers might lead to a slowdown in property transactions, impacting sales and revenue. However, developers could benefit from increased demand for new properties as buyers look for options that minimize their tax liabilities. Developers will need to innovate and adapt their business models to thrive in this new environment.

The government has a crucial role in managing the transition. Effective communication and implementation of the new tax policies will be essential to minimize confusion and ensure compliance. The government may also need to consider additional measures to support the real estate sector during this transition, such as incentives for affordable housing or infrastructure development. The broader economic context is also significant. India’s economy is at a critical juncture, with both opportunities and challenges. The country is poised for significant growth driven by a young, dynamic population, rapid urbanization, and increasing foreign investment. However, it also faces structural challenges such as high inflation, fiscal deficits, and the need for substantial infrastructure development.

In this context, the withdrawal of indexation benefits is part of a broader effort to address fiscal challenges and establish a more robust and sustainable economic framework. Nevertheless, it underscores the need for balanced and nuanced policymaking that considers the diverse needs and interests of different stakeholders. For individual taxpayers, the new tax regime highlights the importance of financial planning and literacy. Understanding the implications of tax changes and making informed decisions will be crucial for optimizing financial outcomes. Taxpayers must stay informed about the latest developments and seek professional advice to navigate the complexities of the new tax environment. Overall, the recent changes in India’s tax policy, particularly the withdrawal of indexation benefits for long-term capital gains, have significant implications for the average Indian. The already heavy tax burden is further exacerbated by these new policies, which may impact real estate transactions, investment strategies, and overall economic stability.

Visit arjaSrikanth.in for more insights