“Harmonising Interstate Disputes: The Crucial Role of the Central Government in Ensuring Peaceful Resolutions”

In a diverse and complex country like India, inter-state conflicts pose significant challenges that require the intervention and cooperation of the central government. This article explores the role of the central government in harmonizing disputes beyond politics, particularly focusing on border disputes and water disputes. By actively addressing these conflicts and finding permanent solutions rather than short-term measures, the central government plays a crucial role in ensuring a fair and peaceful resolution.

Border disputes between states often arise due to conflicting territorial claims. Defining state boundaries based on language can be a complex factor in resolving these disputes, particularly in border areas with populations speaking multiple languages. The Belgaum dispute between Maharashtra and Karnataka and the border dispute between Manipur & Nagaland , Assam & Meghalaya are examples of longstanding conflicts that require the central government’s intervention. Another unresolved dispute is the conflict over Chandigarh City between Haryana and Punjab, despite previous agreements.

Water disputes pose another significant challenge that tests the patience and cooperative spirit of states. As rivers serve as a major resource, conflicts over water can arise between neighboring states. The Cauvery water dispute between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka is a crucial issue that necessitates the central government’s intervention. Similarly, the Narmada water dispute involves Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Maharashtra. By facilitating dialogue and cooperation among states, the central government plays a vital role in ensuring fair and equitable solutions to these water disputes .

To address water disputes between states, the Inter-State River Water Disputes (ISRWD) Act, 1956 was enacted. This act allows for the fair and impartial adjudication of disputes related to inter-state rivers and river valleys’ water. When negotiations between states fail, water disputes tribunals are constituted by the central government. Currently, five water disputes tribunals are active, including the Ravi & Beas Water Tribunal, Krishna Water Disputes Tribunal -II, Vansadhara Water Disputes Tribunal, Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal, and Mahanadi Water Disputes Tribunal. The central government’s involvement in providing a legal framework for resolving water disputes showcases its commitment to ensuring equitable distribution and preventing conflicts over this vital resource.

India’s federal arrangement includes special provisions granted to certain states based on their unique social and historical circumstances. These provisions aim to accommodate the diverse needs and requirements of states. For example, states like Assam, Nagaland, and Mizoram in the northeastern region have special provisions due to their sizable indigenous tribal population and distinct history and culture. Similarly, states like Himachal Pradesh, Goa, Gujarat, Maharashtra, Sikkim, have different provisions to address their unique circumstances. This recognition of diversity and the provision of tailored solutions by the central government contribute to a cooperative federation.

The history of Jammu and Kashmir exemplifies the complexities of inter-state disputes. As one of the large princely states, Jammu and Kashmir had the option to join India, Pakistan, or remain autonomous. In 1947, Pakistan sent infiltrators to capture Kashmir, leading Maharaja Hari Singh to seek Indian assistance and accede to the Indian Union. Jammu and Kashmir was granted special status under Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, granting it greater autonomy compared to other states.

However, the special status under Article 370 no longer exists. The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act 2019 divided the state into two Union territories – Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh. This amendment, effective from October 31, 2019, brought the region under direct central government administration. While this move generated debates and discussions, it highlights the central government’s ability to address complex inter-state disputes and make decisions in the best interest of the nation.

In conclusion, the central government’s role in harmonizing disputes beyond politics is essential for a cooperative federation in India. By actively addressing inter-state conflicts, particularly border disputes and water disputes, the central government plays a vital role in ensuring fair and peaceful resolutions. Moreover, the recognition of unique circumstances through special provisions for certain states and the ability to address complex issues like the Jammu and Kashmir situation demonstrate the central government’s responsiveness and sensitivity to the diverse needs and demands for autonomy of states. Additionally, the enactment of the ISRWD Act and the constitution of water disputes tribunals highlight the central government’s commitment to finding permanent solutions and ensuring long-term stability and cooperation among states. Overall, the central government’s efforts contribute to a harmonious and united India.

Visit arjasrikanth.in for more insights.